Logo

Why is pornography still alive and not illegal? Why doesn’t the government do about tricking women into them?

Last Updated: 19.06.2025 00:49

Why is pornography still alive and not illegal? Why doesn’t the government do about tricking women into them?

But don’t mistake your personal opinion for Moral Truth or the law of the land. If it were, I’d have eggplants (aubergine for you Brits) banned tomorrow.

Making it illegal harms people, especially women.

If you ask anti-porn crusaders why porn should be banned, you will usually get three answers: “My preacher says the invisible god I worship says it’s wrong,” “sex is icky yucky ick ick ick unless it happens between people I say it should happen between, in situations I say it should happen in,” and “lookit all the women who are hurt by porn, I totally care about saving women (but not respecting their autonomy, offering them paid maternity leave, or, you know, doing any of those other things that would materially improve women’s lives).”

A father of 3 felt healthy. Then a routine screening found a rare, deadly illness. - CBS News

There is no legitimate reason to make it illegal.

That’s not a coincidence.

Make a list of the countries where women are treated as second-class citizens or property.

What are 10 interesting facts about you?

There is no legitimate reason to make it illegal.

Compare your lists. Notice anything funny?

Pornography is still alive and not illegal for two reasons:

How mentally ill are Republicans who think Trump is mentally sane? He literally said immigrants eat pets.

Normal people know that what your particular preachers say has no bearing on what is or is not legal.

Here’s a neat mental exercise:

The number of women willing to do porn voluntarily is staggeringly high. Like you wouldn’t even believe.

Why have Indian girls almost stopped wearing sarees?

What your preacher says isn’t worth a wet fart through used toilet paper. Your preacher might say it’s a sin to eat pork or have sex on Sunday or cut your hair in certain ways or whatever, but that doesn’t make it the law of the land.

Look, this is simple, so I’ll type slowly: The more open, legitimate, and free porn production is, the fewer women are trafficked. Why on earth would you take the risk of trafficking people to force them to do something plenty of people are willing to do voluntarily?

Finally, “oh wow I want to protect the wimmens all the poor poor wimmens” ah HA ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha no you heckin’ don’t.

Why do we let ugly men exist?

Say by creating an environment where people do the thing voluntarily, et voila.

Making it illegal harms people, particularly women.

…criminals.

If Trump were to lose in 2024, would that be the end of his grip on the Republican Party?

Make a list of the countries that most stringently ban porn, with the harshest penalties.

Criminals who won’t hesitate to traffic people, if it makes them money. The way you solve the problem is to remove the financial incentive to traffic people.

And what you personally consider icky has even less bearing on what is or is not illegal. You think porn sex is icky? Fine, you do you, bruh.

What are some things that children used to wait for, but are no longer common in today's society?

When you ban porn, you turn porn production into a criminal enterprise. Criminal enterprises are run by…